1. Home
  2. Stories
  3. Erica Herman: Life Journey Of The Women Who Sued Boyfriend 

Erica Herman: Life Journey Of The Women Who Sued Boyfriend 

in Stories
Erica Herman: Life Journey Of The Women Who Sued Boyfriend 
Listen to article

Erica Herman got famous after a controversy with Tiger Wood.Erica Herman is a citizen of the United States of America and serves as the general manager of the Woods Jupiter restaurant in Jupiter, Florida. Let get to know about her relationship and life;

Why she sued tiger woods ?

The ex-girlfriend of Tiger Woods, whose relationship with Woods ended in October, has filed legal complaints against Woods regarding a non-disclosure agreement and her residency at Woods’ house in Hobe Sound, Florida. 

Both of these issues are related to Woods’ ex-girlfriend living at Woods’ house.

According to recent court documents in Martin County, Florida, Woods’ ex-girlfriend Erica Herman is seeking a court’s ruling on the extent of the non-disclosure agreement (NDA), which she says is unenforceable. 

Herman made this request. Herman has argued that the split was quick and is suing for her right to seek damages for the remaining five years of an alleged oral tenancy agreement. These allegations are contained in a separate file.

The NDA, presented to the court in connection with a related matter in a form primarily obscured by black marks, is at the centre of the arguments. 

The non-disclosure agreement (NDA), which it reportedly signed on August 9, 2017, according to the documents filed with the court, states that “any disputes, claims or controversies arising between us of any kind or nature whatsoever…shall be resolved by mandatory BINDING confidential arbitration to the greatest extent permitted by law.”

But Herman is trying to have a judgement from the court so that she may get a clearer understanding of whether or not the NDA is enforceable, as well as the obligations that pertain to her connection with Woods, which may include the obligations of the individuals around her.

In Herman’s complaint, the plaintiff argues that she “does not know if she may divulge, among other things, facts giving rise to numerous legal rights she feels she has.” 

She also needs clarification about what other details about her personal life she may reveal or with whom.

Herman cites the Speak Out Act, passed into law in December 2022, and prohibits non-disclosure agreements entered into before “a dispute arises involving sexual assault or sexual harassment in violation of federal, tribal, or state law.” 

Herman’s complaint, which it filed this week, was filed this week. Herman has not made a direct accusation of sexual misconduct against Woods; nevertheless, according to the civil cover sheet submitted by her attorney, Benjamin Hodas, the case does entail allegations of sexual misconduct.

Following the end of their relationship some months ago, Woods and Herman have been engaged in an ongoing legal battle, primarily focusing on Herman’s ability to continue living at Woods’ residence.

Documents submitted to the court indicate that Woods severed ties with the other person on October 13, 2022. 

Thirteen days later, Herman filed a separate complaint against the Jupiter Island Irrevocable Homestead Trust, which Woods established in February 2017 and is the owner of his primary property in Hobe Sound. 

Herman filed his own complaint on the fourteenth day following the initial complaint. 

In a nutshell, the case filed in October asserts that Herman stayed in Woods’ residence for six years as part of an oral tenancy arrangement between the two and that around five years were still left on the agreement.

The allegations made by Herman in her lawsuit state that the oral tenancy agreement “gave the plaintiff the right to live in the residence for a certain duration of time,” and that “the duties that were performed by, and expected of, [her] were extensive and of an extraordinary nature in light of the overall circumstances and environment in which she lived.”

According to the documents, Woods initiated arbitration proceedings against Herman to respond to the allegations. 

According to the documents submitted by the trust in December, the arbitration request that Woods submitted asserts that “there is no oral tenancy agreement entitling Ms. Herman to inhabit the residence.”

Herman claims that “agents of the [trust] convinced [her] to pack a suitcase for a short vacation and, when she arrived at the airport, they told her that she had been locked out of her residence, in violation of the oral tenancy agreement and in violation of Florida law.” 

Herman’s allegations are based on the fact that “agents of the [trust] convinced [her] to pack a suitcase for a short vacation.” 

Herman also claims that “agents of [the trust’s] attempted to justify their illegal conduct by paying for a hotel room and certain expenses for a short period of time, having successfully locked [Herman] out of her home and frightened her away from returning,” according to the allegations made in the lawsuit.

According to the allegations in the complaint, Herman’s goods and cash totaling more than $40,000, were taken from the residence. 

Because the stated agreement states that Herman no longer has the right to occupy the rental unit as a tenant, he is suing the property owner for monetary damages. 

According to what is said in the complaint, the residence has a “reasonable rental value” that “is likely to be measured in excess of $30 million.”

Herman’s attorneys have filed a motion to dismiss the trustee’s complaint, arguing that the trust “is not a ‘juristic person’ capable of suing or being sued” and that the complaint is “just thinly camouflaged claims arising from disputes directly between Ms. Herman and Mr. Woods.” 

The lawyers for the trust have disputed Herman’s complaint and have asked for it to be dismissed. 

In practice, the legal team representing the trust is steering any potential action toward the arbitration stated in the NDA.

On January 19, Herman’s legal counsel submitted an opposition. They once more cited the Eliminating Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 as a justification for a court to assess the enforceable nature of the non-disclosure agreement (NDA).

Erica Herman Height And Measurements

The celebrity partner, Erica Herman, has a body measurement of 5 feet and 5 inches, equivalent to 168 centimetres or 1.68 metres. 

She weighs 59 kilograms (130 pounds) and is slim. She wears 33 B bras and size 5 shoes. Her bra cup size is also 33 B. (US). She has brown eyes, brown hair, and a fair complexion. Her eyes and hair are also brown.

Erica Herman’s Net Worth

Model and actress Erica Herman is a multi-talented artist. 

It is not known how much she is worth, and other than working at Woods Restaurant, she has no other jobs. 

On the other hand, her spouse is rumoured to have a net worth of $760 million, making him one of the wealthiest golfers in the sport’s history. Her lover is one of the extremely wealthy men in the group.

What does Erica Herman do for a living?

Herman, who used to be a manager at a restaurant, is currently assisting Woods with building a house. 

The source claims that Herman has a positive relationship with Elin Nordegren, who was once married to Tiger Woods. According to a reliable source, Elin and Erica have a pleasant relationship.